Let’s not mention that those “Islamic Terrorists” were the favorite pets of George H. W. Bush during the Reagan years. Here’s a handy
Chronology of
American State Terrorism to help you realize that not everyone agrees that the US is the white knight in it’s global meddling.

I’m not sure why you aren’t blaming the whole terrorist situation of democratic presidents Roosevelt or Kennedy; as long as we are going to go back in years. Personally, I blame all Islamic terrorism on Winston Churchill for flubbing up the division of the former provinces of the Ottoman Empire. At least that has a valid grounding in historical fact.

Delivering newly printed cash by the truckload to the same banks that created the mess isn’t going to do it. Bouncing rocks and people in Afghanistan and Iraq with new and pretty patterns of explosives isn’t cutting it either.

If the current methods aren’t working choose again. Quit fighting the tide with a net.

/saturday-night-live-dont-buy-stuff

-Anthony, LA, CA

Very well. In my opinion–and that of millions of Americans and citizens in the world at large–there is insufficient difference to support Mr McCain’s claims of either “maverick-ness” or his role as a “reformer.” We’ll see whose is still standing after the election.

Your note on “DNA” is immaterial: the arguments for the similarities between Mr McCain and Mr Bush are based on their similar ideologies as demonstrated through Mr McCain’s voting records: 90% in favor of Mr Bush’s policies. Your counterargument about Mr Obama being “afraid of the ramifications of actually having an opinion” is farcical: both Mr Obama and Mr McCain alike have their opinions and, in this electoral maelstrom, are “owning up,” so to speak, of having those opinions.

The Republican Party and its constituency–Republican, right-leaning independent, and whatsoever else–is becoming increasingly desperate, a sign in and of itself of the Republicans’ expectations for the election.

In case anybody hasn’t noticed. Osama Bin Laden hasn’t done a tenth of the damage to the US that we have since done to ourselves.

If someone doesn’t like FoxNews; they could always just watch one of the MANY other channels “palling around with Obama”…hahaha! Really! 20 years ago, 10 years ago, 5 years ago, 1 day ago, we are the friends we keep! Even if Obama supposedly disproved that “rumor” who is to say that they will not reconcile or even that they are not undercover buddies to this day? There are questions there and I think they should be brought up.

What really ticks me off is that Obama is still saying McCain is like Bush. I think we could, if we so chose, do DNA testing to confirm they are not clones, twins, or even related. They are both Republicans. Did they vote the same at times; sure, but that’s the extent of it. It’s like saying all democrats have the same beliefs? Uh, no. I guess that’s why Obama doesn’t want to put his name on anything? He’s afraid of the ramifications of actually having an opinion? Don’t say that because things haven’t been the best for the last few years, that the entire 8 years George Bush was in office have been a nightmare! In my opinion, George Bush and John McCain are two very different individuals!

Their abstract view of the truth is anoying. “we didn’t actually say Barack was a terrorist.” We accused im of “palling around” with them and used his middle name wich 75% of americans find odd and only know one other person with that name. Sure. but they didn’t flat out call hime a terrorist. so they are speaking the truth.